The Radeon HD 8970M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon HD 8970M
The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 70 vs 100 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon HD 8970M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon HD 8970M
May 14th, 2013
Average FPS
50
68%
Min 1% FPS
21
57%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, CA$
CA$272.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.73/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$272.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$531.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$293.16
In Stock
Radeon HD 8970M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon HD 8970M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon HD 8970M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon HD 8970M
May 14th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
91%
Pixel Fillrate
28.8 GPixel/s
61%
Texture Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
68%
FP32
2.304 TFLOPS
34%
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
47.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.774 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon HD 8970M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 14th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 2nd, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | $179.00 |
Solar System | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 96-bit |
153.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 168 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
28.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 47.04 GPixel/s |
72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 105.8 GTexel/s |
2.304 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.774 TFLOPS |