Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon 780M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1412 days older than Radeon 780M.
Advantages of Radeon 780M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 15 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 750% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Radeon 780M - 34 vs 4 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon 780M - 6 vs 0 GB
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
34
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$17.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 840 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Integrated • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 4th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
82%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
92%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon 780M | vs | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Navi III IGP | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 6 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 192-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |