The Radeon 760M is a 2x or more times slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 760M
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti – 15 vs 285 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- A 2x or more times faster gaming GPU than the Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
56
32%
Min 1% FPS
26
24%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
175
100%
Min 1% FPS
109
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1649.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.43/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,649.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,699.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,841.90
In Stock
Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
41.58 GPixel/s
20%
Texture Fillrate
83.17 GTexel/s
13%
FP32
5.323 TFLOPS
13%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
40.09 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 285 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.58 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 208.8 GPixel/s |
| 83.17 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 626.4 GTexel/s |
| 5.323 TFLOPS | FP32 | 40.09 TFLOPS |
