Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 960 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 960 is 864 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Performs up to 22% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 44 vs 36 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 - 35 vs 120 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
36
81.81818181818183%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$212.23
100%
Buy for CA$212.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
51.72413793103448%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
51.74426316487597%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1127 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1178 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |