Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 110 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 74% better in Stray than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 75 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
43
57.333333333333336%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$260.71
100%
Buy for CA$260.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
24.183006535947708%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
26.378103119032463%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$219 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |