Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 2023 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 90% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R7 250 - 78 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
1455 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 1590 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
