Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1950 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 1900% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R7 250E - 20 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 6 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
1455 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 1590 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
