Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 480 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 480 is 1373 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 480 - 50 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 480
- Performs up to 71% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 12 vs 7 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
94%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
42%
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon RX 480 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2016 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $229 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1120 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1266 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |