Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 2221 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 12% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Radeon R9 280 - 65 vs 58 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 50 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
73%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
