Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 1025 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 600% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 7 vs 1 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 50 vs 65 Watts
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
1
14%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$281.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$281.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$281.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
50%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |