Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 545 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 44 vs 38 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q - 65 vs 75 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
38
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$260.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$260.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
66%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1152 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1291 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |