Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 4200 days newer than GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 29 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 197% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GT 520 - 92 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 - 8 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
92
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$329.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$329.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 500 | Generation | Alchemist |
$59 | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |