Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 4748 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 53% better in Valorant than GeForce 210 - 754 vs 492 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 6% cheaper than Arc A750 - CA$272.51 vs CA$288.51
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 31 vs 225 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$288.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74222 minutes ago
Buy for CA$272.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
0.7738095238095238%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
0.7738095238095238%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$289 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |