Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 390 outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 390 is 2039 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390 - 69 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390
- Performs up to 61% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GT 240 - 53 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 8 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GT 240
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Radeon R9 390
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| $80 | MSRP | $329 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| 550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
