Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 1549 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 69 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GT 240 - 40 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 2 vs 1 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GT 240
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $80 | MSRP | $149 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
