Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3100 outperforms GeForce 920M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3100 is 822 days newer than GeForce 920M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 33 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than GeForce 920M - 87 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 920M - 4 vs 2 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
87
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$286.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$286.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
954 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |