Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 3418 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 53% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 46 vs 30 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 30 vs 45 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
46
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$145.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
16%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
82%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
HD Graphics | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |