Key Differences
In short — Iris Pro Graphics 5200 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is 151 days older than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 45 vs 50 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
42
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$134.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$134.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
40%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | DDR3 |
System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |