Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 910 days newer than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 19% better in Fortnite than Iris Plus Graphics 640 - 37 vs 31 FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
37
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$269.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$269.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13871 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
31%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
78%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |