Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1328 days older than Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 30 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 38% better in Elden Ring than Arc A310 - 65 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 6 vs 4 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
32.95668549905838%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
32.9605650382578%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |