Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6600 XT is 439 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 74% cheaper than Radeon RX 6600 XT - CA$146.02 vs CA$567.14
- Up to 55% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon RX 6600 XT - CA$3.04 vs CA$6.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT - 30 vs 160 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Performs up to 75% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Arc A310 - 84 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 8 vs 4 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
48
57%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$146.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$146.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 30th, 2021
FPS
84
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.75/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$567.14
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$567.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 30th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 30th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 30th, 2021 |
Alchemist | Generation | Navi II |
Not Available | MSRP | $379 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1968 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2589 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |