Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon PRO W7600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 77 days older than Radeon PRO W7600.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 31% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon PRO W7600 - 71 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 20% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon PRO W7600 - CA$11.10 vs CA$13.85 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 16 vs 8 GB
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7600
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 130 vs 165 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
71
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$788
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$788 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
54
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$13.85/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$747.93
100%
Buy for CA$747.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
78%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
91%
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | vs | Radeon PRO W7600 |
---|---|---|
May 18th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 40 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$499 | MSRP | $599 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
1x 16-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
2310 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1720 MHz |
2535 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2440 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |