The GeForce GTX 1050 is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon 780M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050
The Radeon 780M is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon 780M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 15 vs 75 Watts
GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon 780M for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
51
86%
Min 1% FPS
22
79%
Price, CA$
CA$327.58
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.42/FPS
100%
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
59
100%
Min 1% FPS
28
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon 780M in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon 780M in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon 780M in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
46.56 GPixel/s
54%
Texture Fillrate
58.2 GTexel/s
45%
FP32
1.862 TFLOPS
22%
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
86.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
129.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.294 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$109.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
GeForce 10 | Generation | Navi III IGP |
Desktop | Segment | Integrated |
75 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | System-Shared |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | System-Shared |
128-bit | Memory Bus | System-Shared |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | System-Shared |
Theoretical Performance | ||
46.56 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 86.4 GPixel/s |
58.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 129.6 GTexel/s |
1.862 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.294 TFLOPS |