In Battlefield 6, the GeForce GTS 250 is much slower than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $157 cheaper!
GeForce GTS 250
- Up to 47% cheaper – $174.99 vs $332.00
- Up to 47% cheaper
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Up to 2600% faster in Battlefield 6 – 27 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 2600% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Nov 22, 2019 vs Mar 04, 2009
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 93% better value in Battlefield 6 – $12.29 vs $174.99/FPS
- Up to 93% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 100 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce GTS 250 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTS 250
Mar 4th, 2009
Average FPS
1 FPS
4%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
5%
Price, $
$174.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$174.99/FPS
7%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
$332
52%
Value, $/FPS
$12.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTS 250 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTS 250 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTS 250
Mar 4th, 2009
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
64.51 GB/s
34%
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
20%
Texture Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
414.7 GFLOPS
9%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTS 250 Mar 4th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Nov 22nd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Released | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $159.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
