In Battlefield 6, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is much slower than the Arc A770 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $52 more expensive!
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 100 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 211% faster in Battlefield 6 – 84 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 211% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Nov 22, 2019
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 16% cheaper – $279.99 vs $332.00
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.33 vs $12.29/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Battlefield 6
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
27 FPS
32%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
32%
Price, $
$332
84%
Value, $/FPS
$12.29/FPS
27%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
84 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
22%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Nov 22nd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 22nd, 2019 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$159.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
