The GeForce GT 520M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520M
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 12 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 1 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Average FPS
39
98%
Min 1% FPS
14
93%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Average FPS
40
100%
Min 1% FPS
15
100%
Price, CA$
CA$212.96
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.32/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
1.344 GPixel/s
65%
Texture Fillrate
5.376 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
129 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
77%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
31%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 520M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 5th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 500M | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
12 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
1 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
12.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.344 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
5.376 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
129 GFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
