Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3480 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of GeForce 210
- Up to 12% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - CA$207.32 vs CA$235.51
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 31 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 82% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than GeForce 210 - 51 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 38% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than GeForce 210 - CA$4.62 vs CA$7.40 per FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0 GB
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for CA$207.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1411 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
51
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$235.51
88%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$235.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1411 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 210 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |