The GeForce 210 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 31 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 0 GB
GeForce 210 vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Average FPS
40
62%
Min 1% FPS
15
47%
Price, CA$
CA$212.96
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.32/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce 210 vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
2%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
1%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 0.5 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
| 4.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
| 39.36 GFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |
