Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms Radeon R9 280X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 1399 days newer than Radeon R9 280X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 867% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R9 280X - 29 vs 3 FPS
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 8 vs 3 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 250 vs 295 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Vega | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$499 | MSRP | $299 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR5 |
2048-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1247 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
1546 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
945 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |