Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 64 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 1222 days older than Radeon RX Vega 64.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 8 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon RX Vega 64 - 38 vs 29 FPS
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 19 vs 295 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Radeon RX Vega 64
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon RX Vega 64
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
| Vega | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $499 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| 2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| HBM2 | Type | DDR3 |
| 2048-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
1247 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
| 1546 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
945 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |
