Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 1335 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 25% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 45 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 3 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 35 vs 250 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
36
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$177.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$177.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
30%
AMD Radeon R9 280X | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$299 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
850 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |