Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1893 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 66% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon R7 260 - 111 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 6 vs 2 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$319.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12023 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 260 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$109 | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |