Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 130 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 45% better in Far Cry 6 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 97 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 62% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - CA$229.37 vs CA$599.89
- Up to 45% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - CA$3.42 vs CA$6.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 65 vs 120 Watts
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
97
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.18/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$599.89
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$599.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
67
69%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$229.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$229.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
24%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
24%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |