Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2093 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$260.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
71.42857142857144%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
71.42857142857144%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |