Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 932 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 36% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - CA$220.32 vs CA$346.18
- Up to 14% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Radeon Pro W6400 - CA$9.58 vs CA$11.17 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 35% better in The Last of Us Part I than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 31 vs 23 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 50 vs 65 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
23
74%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$220.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
31
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.17/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$346.18
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$346.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
37%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |