Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1006 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 35 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 27% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 47 vs 37 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
37
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$154.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$154.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
66%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
37%
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $249 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |