Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1786 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than GeForce 210 - 94 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 2 vs 0.5 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 31 vs 190 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
83
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$94.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$94.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 285 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$249 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
918 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1375 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |