Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260 is 1265 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Performs up to 3% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 35 vs 34 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
34
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$169.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$169.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
81%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $109 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |