Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4342 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 38% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W3690 - 161 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3690 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$744.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $744.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3690 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Gulftown | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |