Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 4677 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon W3680 - 227 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
227
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$479
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3680 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |