In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon W3670 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W3670
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 194 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Is 14 years and 4 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 14 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 120 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon W3670 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
90%
Price, $
$569
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W3670 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W3670 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM5 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
