In Atomfall, the Xeon W3670 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W3670
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 14 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon W3670 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W3670 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W3670 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
