In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Xeon W3670 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W3670
No clear advantages
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 44% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 134 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 44% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Xeon W3670 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
134 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$463.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
