In Starfield, the Xeon W3670 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W3670
No clear advantages
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield – 92 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Starfield FPS Calculator
Xeon W3670 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
92 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
