In Rust, the Xeon W3670 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W3670
No clear advantages
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 234 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon W3670 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
