In Rust, the Xeon W3670 is slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W3670
No clear advantages
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 21% faster in Rust – 255 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon W3670 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
