In Control, the Xeon W3670 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W3670
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 252 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 13 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 13 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 60 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon W3670 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
252 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.46
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W3670 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
