In Rust, the Xeon w3-2425 is faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon w3-2425
- Up to 15% faster in Rust – 241 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Rust
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer – Feb 15, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon w3-2425 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon w3-2425 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon w3-2425 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon w3-2425
Feb 15th, 2023
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4400 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
24%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon w3-2425 Feb 15th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 15th, 2023 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $529.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA4677 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4400 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
