In Battlefield 6, the Xeon W-3175X is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W-3175X
No clear advantages
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6 – 120 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jan 30, 2019
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 125 vs 255 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon W-3175X vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
120 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$291.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W-3175X vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W-3175X vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W-3175X
Jan 30th, 2019
Cores
28-core
100%
L3 Cache
38.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
57%
L3 Cache
30 MB
78%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W-3175X Jan 30th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 30th, 2019 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| $2,999.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA3647 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 255 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
