In Control, the Xeon W-2140B is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W-2140B
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 255 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Jan 28, 2025 vs Dec 21, 2017
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon W-2140B vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W-2140B vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W-2140B vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W-2140B
Dec 21st, 2017
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
11 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W-2140B Dec 21st, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 28th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 21st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 28th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 120W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
